IITU
Advanced Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Tools, Techniques, and Ethical Considerations


Course Instructor: Ali Abd Almisreb

Course Duration:

6 Weeks (1 session per week, 1.5 hours each)


Week

In-Class Activities

Self-Study

1

Introduction to AI in Academic Writing

Overview of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot) Ethical considerations and academic integrity Hands-on demo of basic AI tools

Read articles on the history and evolution of AI in writing Explore introductory tutorials for AI tools

2

AI for Research and Literature Review

Using AI to brainstorm research topics AI-assisted literature search and review Evaluating sources and identifying biases

Practice using AI tools for literature searches Write a summary of a research article using AI assistance

3

Structuring and Outlining Academic Papers

Generating outlines with AI tools Organizing ideas and structuring arguments Case studies of AI-generated outlines

Create an outline for a research paper using AI Compare AI-generated outlines with traditional methods

4

Drafting and Writing with AI

Drafting sections of a paper using AI Enhancing clarity and coherence with AI suggestions Avoiding over-reliance on AI-generated content

Draft a section of your paper with AI assistance Reflect on the differences between AI-generated and self-written drafts

5

Editing and Proofreading with AI

Using AI for grammar and style checks Improving readability and flow Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

Edit a draft using AI tools Peer review and provide feedback on AI-edited drafts

6

Ethical Use and Future of AI in Writing

Discussing the future of AI in academic writing Ethical use and citation of AI-generated content Final project presentations

Prepare a final project using AI tools Write a reflection on the ethical implications of AI in writing


Course Objectives

  1. Understand AI Tools: Equip students with a comprehensive understanding of various AI tools available for academic writing.
  2. Ethical Use: Promote ethical considerations and integrity in the use of AI for academic purposes.
  3. Practical Application: Enable students to practically apply AI tools in different stages of academic writing, from research to drafting and editing.
  4. Critical Thinking: Develop students’ critical thinking skills by evaluating the effectiveness and limitations of AI tools.
  5. Collaboration and Feedback: Foster a collaborative learning environment through peer reviews and group discussions.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this course, students will be able to:

  1. Identify and Utilize AI Tools: Identify appropriate AI tools for various academic writing tasks and utilize them effectively.
  2. Conduct AI-Assisted Research: Conduct thorough literature reviews and research using AI tools, ensuring the credibility and relevance of sources.
  3. Draft and Edit with AI: Draft and edit academic papers with the assistance of AI tools, enhancing clarity, coherence, and overall quality.
  4. Evaluate Ethical Implications: Critically evaluate the ethical implications of using AI in academic writing and adhere to ethical guidelines.
  5. Produce High-Quality Research Articles: Produce well-structured, original, and insightful research articles that demonstrate a deep understanding of the subject matter.
  6. Reflect on AI Use: Reflect on their experiences using AI tools, discussing both the benefits and challenges encountered.
  7. Present Research Findings: Effectively present their research findings and experiences with AI tools to an audience, demonstrating clear and professional communication skills.

Assessment:

In order to pass the course, students have to apply their knowledge by writing research articles in the form of groups or individuals:

Project Ideas for Research Articles

  • AI in Education:
  • Topic: The impact of AI tools on student learning outcomes.
  • Objective: Analyze how AI tools are being used in educational settings and their effectiveness.
  • Ethical Implications of AI in Writing:
  • Topic: Ethical considerations in using AI for academic writing.
  • Objective: Explore the ethical challenges and propose guidelines for ethical AI use.
  • AI and Academic Integrity:
  • Topic: The role of AI in maintaining or compromising academic integrity.
  • Objective: Investigate cases where AI has been used both ethically and unethically in academic contexts.
  • AI for Literature Reviews:
  • Topic: Enhancing literature review processes with AI tools.
  • Objective: Compare traditional literature review methods with AI-assisted methods.
  • AI in Scientific Research:
  • Topic: Applications of AI in scientific research and data analysis.
  • Objective: Examine how AI is transforming research methodologies in various scientific fields.
  • AI and Writing Style:
  • Topic: The influence of AI on writing style and quality.
  • Objective: Assess how AI tools can improve or alter the writing style of academic papers.
  • Future of AI in Academic Writing:
  • Topic: Predicting future trends in AI-assisted academic writing.
  • Objective: Speculate on how AI might evolve and its potential impact on academic writing.

Project Structure

  1. Proposal: Students submit a proposal outlining their chosen topic, objectives, and methodology.
  2. Research: Conduct thorough research using AI tools for literature review, data collection, and analysis.
  3. Drafting: Write the initial draft with the help of AI tools, focusing on structure, clarity, and coherence.
  4. Editing: Use AI tools for grammar and style checks, and peer review drafts for feedback.
  5. Final Submission: Submit the final research article, including a reflection on the use of AI tools throughout the process.
  6. Presentation: Present their findings and experiences with AI tools to the class.

Criteria

Excellent (90-100%)

Good (80-89%)

Satisfactory (70-79%)

Needs Improvement (60-69%)

Unsatisfactory (<60%)

Content & Research

Thorough, in-depth research; all sources are credible and well-integrated.

Good research with credible sources; minor gaps in depth or integration.

Adequate research; some sources may lack credibility or integration.

Limited research; several sources lack credibility or are poorly integrated.

Insufficient research; sources are not credible or poorly integrated.

Organization & Structure

Clear, logical structure; excellent flow and coherence.

Logical structure; good flow and coherence.

Basic structure; some issues with flow and coherence.

Weak structure; significant issues with flow and coherence.

Poor structure; lacks logical flow and coherence.

Use of AI Tools

Effective and ethical use of AI tools; enhances the quality of the article.

Good use of AI tools; generally enhances the article.

Basic use of AI tools; some enhancement to the article.

Limited use of AI tools; minimal enhancement to the article.

Poor or unethical use of AI tools; does not enhance the article.

Writing Quality

Excellent grammar, style, and clarity; no errors.

Good grammar, style, and clarity; few minor errors.

Adequate grammar, style, and clarity; some errors.

Weak grammar, style, and clarity; numerous errors.

Poor grammar, style, and clarity; pervasive errors.

Originality & Insight

Highly original and insightful; demonstrates deep understanding and critical thinking.

Good originality and insight; demonstrates understanding and critical thinking.

Some originality and insight; demonstrates basic understanding and critical thinking.

Limited originality and insight; demonstrates minimal understanding and critical thinking.

Lacks originality and insight; demonstrates poor understanding and critical thinking.

Ethical Considerations

Thorough discussion of ethical implications; adheres to ethical guidelines.

Good discussion of ethical implications; generally adheres to ethical guidelines.

Basic discussion of ethical implications; some adherence to ethical guidelines.

Limited discussion of ethical implications; minimal adherence to ethical guidelines.

Poor discussion of ethical implications; does not adhere to ethical guidelines.

Presentation

Professional and engaging presentation; clear and effective communication.

Good presentation; clear and effective communication.

Adequate presentation; some issues with communication.

Weak presentation; significant issues with communication.

Poor presentation; ineffective communication.

Версия сайта для слабовидящих