Course Instructor: Ali Abd Almisreb
Course Duration:
6 Weeks (1 session per week, 1.5 hours each)
Course Instructor: Ali Abd Almisreb
Course Duration:
6 Weeks (1 session per week, 1.5 hours each)
|
Week |
In-Class Activities |
Self-Study |
|
1 |
Introduction to AI in Academic Writing Overview of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot) Ethical considerations and academic integrity Hands-on demo of basic AI tools |
Read articles on the history and evolution of AI in writing Explore introductory tutorials for AI tools |
|
2 |
AI for Research and Literature Review Using AI to brainstorm research topics AI-assisted literature search and review Evaluating sources and identifying biases |
Practice using AI tools for literature searches Write a summary of a research article using AI assistance |
|
3 |
Structuring and Outlining Academic Papers Generating outlines with AI tools Organizing ideas and structuring arguments Case studies of AI-generated outlines |
Create an outline for a research paper using AI Compare AI-generated outlines with traditional methods |
|
4 |
Drafting and Writing with AI Drafting sections of a paper using AI Enhancing clarity and coherence with AI suggestions Avoiding over-reliance on AI-generated content |
Draft a section of your paper with AI assistance Reflect on the differences between AI-generated and self-written drafts |
|
5 |
Editing and Proofreading with AI Using AI for grammar and style checks Improving readability and flow Common pitfalls and how to avoid them |
Edit a draft using AI tools Peer review and provide feedback on AI-edited drafts |
|
6 |
Ethical Use and Future of AI in Writing Discussing the future of AI in academic writing Ethical use and citation of AI-generated content Final project presentations |
Prepare a final project using AI tools Write a reflection on the ethical implications of AI in writing |
Course Objectives
Learning Outcomes
By the end of this course, students will be able to:
Assessment:
In order to pass the course, students have to apply their knowledge by writing research articles in the form of groups or individuals:
Project Ideas for Research Articles
Project Structure
|
Criteria |
Excellent (90-100%) |
Good (80-89%) |
Satisfactory (70-79%) |
Needs Improvement (60-69%) |
Unsatisfactory (<60%) |
|
Content & Research |
Thorough, in-depth research; all sources are credible and well-integrated. |
Good research with credible sources; minor gaps in depth or integration. |
Adequate research; some sources may lack credibility or integration. |
Limited research; several sources lack credibility or are poorly integrated. |
Insufficient research; sources are not credible or poorly integrated. |
|
Organization & Structure |
Clear, logical structure; excellent flow and coherence. |
Logical structure; good flow and coherence. |
Basic structure; some issues with flow and coherence. |
Weak structure; significant issues with flow and coherence. |
Poor structure; lacks logical flow and coherence. |
|
Use of AI Tools |
Effective and ethical use of AI tools; enhances the quality of the article. |
Good use of AI tools; generally enhances the article. |
Basic use of AI tools; some enhancement to the article. |
Limited use of AI tools; minimal enhancement to the article. |
Poor or unethical use of AI tools; does not enhance the article. |
|
Writing Quality |
Excellent grammar, style, and clarity; no errors. |
Good grammar, style, and clarity; few minor errors. |
Adequate grammar, style, and clarity; some errors. |
Weak grammar, style, and clarity; numerous errors. |
Poor grammar, style, and clarity; pervasive errors. |
|
Originality & Insight |
Highly original and insightful; demonstrates deep understanding and critical thinking. |
Good originality and insight; demonstrates understanding and critical thinking. |
Some originality and insight; demonstrates basic understanding and critical thinking. |
Limited originality and insight; demonstrates minimal understanding and critical thinking. |
Lacks originality and insight; demonstrates poor understanding and critical thinking. |
|
Ethical Considerations |
Thorough discussion of ethical implications; adheres to ethical guidelines. |
Good discussion of ethical implications; generally adheres to ethical guidelines. |
Basic discussion of ethical implications; some adherence to ethical guidelines. |
Limited discussion of ethical implications; minimal adherence to ethical guidelines. |
Poor discussion of ethical implications; does not adhere to ethical guidelines. |
|
Presentation |
Professional and engaging presentation; clear and effective communication. |
Good presentation; clear and effective communication. |
Adequate presentation; some issues with communication. |
Weak presentation; significant issues with communication. |
Poor presentation; ineffective communication. |